The Richard J. Childressis a premier academic event highlighting a provocative and timely area of law.
The lecture commemorates the contributions Dean Childress made academically, ethically, and socially to benefit the Saint Louis University School of Law. Childress was a member of the faculty at the School of Law for almost 30 years, and then served for 15 years as associate dean and dean. Established by the generosity of alumni and friends of the former dean, the lecture aims to enhance the exemplary teaching at the School of Law by bringing world-renowned scholars to campus for academic enrichment.
On Oct. The use of technology always involves tradeoffs: we sacrifice some of our privacy or liberty to gain convenience or security. Some people are happy to make these tradeoffs; some balk at them; and others yield to them as inevitable. The decline of the traditional media as information intermediaries has transformed and coarsened social and political communication, making it easier for misinformation and vitriol to spread. The result?
Higher purpose. greater good.
Political campaigns that increasingly take place under conditions of voter mistrust and groupthink, with the potential for foreign interference and domestic political manipulation via new and increasingly sophisticated technological tools. Such dramatic changes raise deep questions about the conditions of electoral legitimacy and threaten to shake the foundation of democratic governance.
This conference considered how this challenging information environment will affect election law in areas such as campaigns, campaign finance, and voting rights, and what election law might be able to do about it. The keynote speaker was Richard L. View Professor Hasen's keynote address.
View the Panel Video. Louis where race no longer predicts life outcomes. A series of panels explored criminology and crime control; education reform; and race, health, and social justice. Tracey L. Meares was the keynote speaker.
Her address was titled "Synthesizing Narratives of Policing.
Panelists discussed how the modern criminal justice system in the U. The keynote speaker was Samuel R. View the Journal issue for this lecture. On October, the Childress Memorial Lecture addressed the continuing inequality in the criminal courts. While Americans are increasingly aware of issues involving law enforcement agencies and communities of color, less attention has been paid to the courts to which those arrested are sent after being taken into custody.
In that system, numerous discretionary decisions are made by prosecutors, such as whether to file charges; whether a high bail be set so the accused remains in jail; what charges to bring; whether to seek enhanced penalties such as the death penalty, life imprisonment without the possibility of parole or a mandatory minimum of years in prison; whether to make a plea offer and what offer to make; what information to disclose to the defense; and whether to strike prospective jurors based on race during jury selection. Most of the discretionary decisions are made by white men, even though virtually all the people appearing before some criminal courts are people of color.
First lady biography: sarah polk
People are often prosecuted in municipal courts whose primary purpose is revenue generation and not law enforcement. In those courts and others, the accused may be denied a lawyer to assist them, or may be given a lawyer who lacks the competence, resources, experience, training and, in some cases, the inclination to provide a zealous and effective defense.
In many states, the people in charge of this system — governors, legislators, prosecutors and judges — want it to remain as it is because it gives the prosecution an enormous advantage in obtaining convictions, fines, jail and prison terms, and death sentences. The keynote speaker was Stephen B. On November 13,scholars from across the country addressed conflicts following recent legal developments in areas such as same-sex marriage, birth control coverage and mandatory vaccinations, examining the clashing of rights and how they could potentially be resolved.
On October 25,the Childress Memorial Lecture addressed the "long and not-so-merry war" between proponents of federalism and nationalists.
As a result, many of the debates in the field are beside the point, and it would be better for scholars to direct their considerable energies at different questions than the ones they have traditionally pursued. Fall Updates. Childress Memorial Lecture.
Richard J. McMullen, managing attorney, Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Mae C. Davis, associate dean for experiential education and professor of law, Northeastern University School of Law Juliana C. Louis Circuit Attorney Thomas B.